Whenever I see people saying something like "we'll always need small towns to exist because agriculture" or something to that effect I wonder: are they trying to convince me, or themselves?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Public transportation seems self evidently necessary. Having a city in which millions of people each drive their own car to work and back just doesn't seem practical on any level.
-
Those aren't the only choices though. What about walking etc? More to the point: this is about *rhetoric* rather than facts. I'm inclined to think large-scale production will always necessitate small rural communities, too--but that doesn't make it good rhetoric to say so!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.