This is the sort of stuff you'll say if you take for granted that the only people who would ever use transit are the desperately poor. Again, the grocery store example: are grocery stores only *nominally* profitable? Do the bulk of their customers rely on benefits to shop there?https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Br1ght/status/1045384194845802496 …
-
-
If public transit would cost me a new bike (rather than used (stolen)) bike every month, I'd rather just get the bike (100 vs at least 350 usd). Who's gonna prioritize transportation?! Not just for the poor? If poor means below upper middle class.
-
"I'd rather just get the bike" That's entirely up to you! No harm in that. "Who's gonna prioritize transportation?" Who prioritizes it now? It's hard to get people to prioritize charity, but easy to prioritize making money. "If poor means below upper middle class" it doesn't
-
The politicians prioritize expanding it and getting new (uglier) vehicles etc. I suppose the situation is special because there's a mass immigration to adapt it to.
-
The new subway carts has better AC, but the air quality is still far worse than in the old ones.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.