Time for a recap: how do profitable passenger railways work?https://twitter.com/380kmh/status/841677955562590208 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
What's the goal? "Stable, high profitability in our railway operations!" For every 3 households in their service area, they have 2 daily riders. Nice ratio--20 times higher than the equivalent for Boston's commuter rail!pic.twitter.com/9jlzA6loL2
When we look at the largest railway in Japan, the same principle holds up: transport provides a higher share of income (71%) than of revenue (68%)...pic.twitter.com/Yw8CEipSXa
...more of that revenue comes from ordinary ticket holders (occasional riders) than from pass holders (regular riders), and more of it comes from ordinary trains than from high speed rail--especially ordinary trains in the suburban/commuter networkpic.twitter.com/M49Q8UWPP7
30% of trips in Tokyo are made by transit--I'm not sure how much higher that share is if you focus on "trips to work," as is typical of mode share reports in the USA.pic.twitter.com/ILd9iVftEU
It's not in the USA, but Toronto has done very well when it comes to higher transit mode share *for commuting,* tho again, I wonder how this compares to overall travel. Remember, focus on the ENTIRE market, not just commuters!pic.twitter.com/nYcDRrskYv
How to stay in business once you're already making money? Raise demand, add value! Get more people to use your trains, and make it a better experience for them every time they come back:pic.twitter.com/lrsKwfsbd7
And finally: what do they use all that money for? East Japan Railway was formed during the privatization of the old national railway, so it still has to pay down its predecessor's debt--something I expect any American railways seeking profitability would also have to think about:pic.twitter.com/nEXGwfSqGj
Let's make it happen here, too! Don't let people trick you into thinking "for profit" is a bad thing when it comes to railways
#TrainTwitterpic.twitter.com/2zHTW7dN2V
I wonder if this is a chicken or the egg situation: companies need permissive enough land-use regimes for this model to work, but cities won't change the status quo (and still might not anyway unless high quality transit is already up and running?
Maybe--but I'm skeptical to say this is entirely due to land-use practices: https://thredbo-conference-series.org/downloads/thredbo7_papers/thredbo7-workshopC-Shoji-Killeen.pdf …
Oh I know it's not entirely an land-use issue. To your first point, you're never gonna achieve profitability if don't prioritize it. Not only is that not a priority in the US, it's not even really a consideration!
exactly--people just take for granted it's impossible, which turns into a self-fulfilling prophecy
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.