they can be--but the default for rural life in USA is much more energy intensive, per person, than urban life (and that's to say nothing of the geographical footprint) https://twitter.com/themechaprimate/status/1037183011601690625 …
Lmao, this isn't a matter of "disagreement;" higher taxes have little to do with environmental impact. Part of the picture is that rural infra is paid for by city taxes. Part of it is that American cities *are* poorly designed (eg SF is expensive bc too little housing).
-
-
Where do you get you information? Cities do not pay for rural infrastructure. Cities are a cancer on the population. There are no well designed cities. There must be a balance with food production, housing, natural preserve, manufacturing, governance, etc., plus permanence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
no way.