Common confusion is to think that "environmentalism" has something to do with how many trees are within 1/4 mile of your house, rather than how much energy it takes to keep your house supplied and functionalhttps://twitter.com/ahnqir/status/1036626983046664194 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @MagnusVonBraun
yes and you don't need to be in the middle of them for them to do their work (and indeed they will do better without a lawn-sized hole in their ecosystem)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MagnusVonBraun
yes it not an either/or, but living in the woods is fundamentally something that makes more sense in the countryside than immediately adjacent to the capital city
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MagnusVonBraun
trees in cities for health benefits of residents =/= a forest
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @380kmh @MagnusVonBraun
solarpunk yes, but that doesn't mean you're gonna have bears and moose in the streets--it will remain a very different ecosystem from the forest
10:05 AM - 3 Sep 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.