Common confusion is to think that "environmentalism" has something to do with how many trees are within 1/4 mile of your house, rather than how much energy it takes to keep your house supplied and functionalhttps://twitter.com/ahnqir/status/1036626983046664194 …
-
-
Slap solar panels on the roof& let them sell excess back into the grid.
-
better than nothing, but won't do anything about the road, lawn, and all the other houses on that street breaking up the ecosystem
-
Oh yeah lawns should be illegal past a certain water use limit esp in the more dry parts of the country.
-
Do u have any enviro policy takes?
-
not in great detail off the top of my head--except for encouraging vast "contiguous zones" of undeveloped land, I will poast map soon
-
rough examples here (red circles in first pic, labels in second) of large-scale and moderate-scale zones, idea is that development priority is on the seams and away from the centerpic.twitter.com/uh8CTSo2NG
-
I only labeled some, but any "bubble" space btw infrastructure corridors would qualify, even if quite small - penalties for new buildings/roads/etc that scale up towards center of zone - rewards & incentives for abandoning buildings/roads/etc that scale up towards center of zone
-
the objective isn't to prohibit *all* use of those zones (parts of them would be available for hunting, logging, and what have you on a rotating basis; people could still live in them if they are grandfathered in or pay the dev penalty) but to set a depop trend there
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I live close to the bougie part of the south shore, but when I drive through, like, Weston I'm always like "What is even going on here?"
-
lmao u nailed it, I was gonna pick from Wayland or Sudbury if not Weston
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
weston?
-
u got it king
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.