Think about this attitude here, there are two things going on: 1) to make a transit center accessible = to make it accessible to drivers 2) therefore it has to be kept away from houses and shops, because the traffic and parking would be disruptive Park and ride = bad transit!https://twitter.com/tlockney/status/1030983254805897216 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @380kmh
Do you know that neighborhood at all? I'm curious where you would have put it that would be better? I'm still waiting on
@stephenjudkins to reply on that one. I'm not saying it's the best option, but I'm honestly curious to know the "solution" (not that there's only one).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I guess another way to make the point I didn't make well in the first place: I don't think it's the transit stops themselves that are the problem so much as the developers in these suburbs. They regularly choose to build without transit options in mind. That's the insane part.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Well, developers and city planners, to be realistic. The planning efforts in Portlands suburbs are a joke. The area where I live has a low-freq commuter bus line and that's it. It's not that Trimet could supply more, but they'd be empty because of the way people are spread out.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tlockney @stephenjudkins
Sure, I'll concede that there's not necessarily a better location on the line to build a stop (I might argue if it were a neighborhood I knew). So the trick is--once having built the station--to build around it, instead of leaving it to parking. Takes a long time tho.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @380kmh @stephenjudkins
It's not just a long time. It's a commitment between the transit authority, the city and metro planners, the developers, and the community to be focused on a decades long plan. That's where things break down consistently.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
My main point is that picking on Trimet (operators of Portland's transit) is the wrong target. I'd argue they've done remarkably well, all things considered.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @tlockney @stephenjudkins
That's reasonable, when comparing among American operators. But lest Trimet think they're already doing the best job *possible,* it's important to be clear on where they still fall short and have room to improve.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
It's also important, I think, for developers, planners, community members, etc, to have some clear picture of what Trimet is trying to achieve in the eventual future. We talk about using transit more, but many don't have a mental image more detailed than "status quo + a train"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.