No sidewalks, no bike lanes, no crosswalks--goodness, how will cyclists and pedestrians survive in such a hostile environment???pic.twitter.com/0CqLUG7Yjo
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I'm being (perhaps unnecessarily) salty here, but I must press the point that walkable (and bike-friendly) urbanism IS NOT ABOUT BUILDING INFRASTRUCTURE FOR WALKING (OR BIKING) good urbanism is about structures more than infrastructure! many small buildings, close together
It's a difficult point to make because it can lead to the wrong conclusion that you don't need sidewalks etc *anywhere,* when in fact they're essential on major arterial streets--but most streets in a city aren't arterials, and shouldn't be as wide as arterials!
whole idea of walking--if you ask me--is it doesn't need its own infrastructure! I can almost say the same for biking--but bikes do better on paved surfaces than on grass/dirt/gravel (cyclists were first political bloc in USA to push for asphalt roads: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Roads_Movement …)
As I said to Eric--kinda missing the point there
no culture only rules regulations and safety here
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.