I think the higher costs ARE changing things for them, but just that it's a highly uneven and fairly slow process. Just look at Boston --> Quincy/Malden/Worcester/Salem/Portsmouth/Nashua/Portland, and even that's a poor example just because Boston has so many satellites.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As it is for most public transit systems, no?
-
Most outside Japan aren't profitable at all, and riders are subsidized by non-riders
-
But ya ur point stands: single trip riders incur smaller losses than passholders
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
seems like a decent model for affordability; lets you plan ahead to reduce costs, like in most things
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.