people really out here thinking houses maintain themselveshttps://twitter.com/Alysonesque/status/1005989848577073152 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @380kmh
If rent only went toward covering building maintenance and wasn’t a way for landlords to generate profits from their “investment,” we’d all be paying a hell of a lot less (esp in high-demand cities where rents rise w/o corresponding improvements in building quality)
5 replies 0 retweets 34 likes -
In a slightly better world, we’d only have to cover the costs of maintenance and utilities, but so long as housing is sold for profit and humans need to live somewhere, landlords have no incentive *not* to suck us dry
4 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @drooliet
the costs of maintenance + utilities in their own right, but also the costs of providing for the maintainers + utility workers--what I'm getting at is that no matter how utopian the society, people in it will need to work and pay for their housing
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @380kmh
firetrucks and streetlamps also cost $ to maintain, but we’ve decided that those are important enough to warrant public funding. Why should housing be any different?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @drooliet
A tiny fraction of inhabited streets actually have streetlamps; emergency services are a situation where we rarely actually need them, but need them to be in excellent working order when we DO need them. I argue medical care falls into same category--but not housing or food...
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
...because housing and food we need *all the time,* and we can handle a wide range in quality, price, and selection, according to our taste and means. For people who struggle with these "all the time" expenses, we DO allocate public funding--but we could do a better job of it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This isn’t really the important question. What matters is whether or not we should *aspire* to providing these things, or if we want our society to be one in which it’s possible to be homeless or to starve.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
How to do this is a complex and interesting question we should all discuss at length. There may not be satisfying answers! But the reality is that there are people that want the threat of starvation to loom over everyone who cannot produce value for someone else.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I think more people are resigned to the risk of starvation than there are that actually endorse it--but I also think that people in the former category could sound like the latter if they're tired of explaining it
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.