Important point here! A bit overstated--transit functions well even if it's not operating at capacity--but the point holds, there is a GAP between what car traffic is capable of and what transit is designed forhttps://twitter.com/poiThePoi/status/1004049716177498114 …
Certainly it's important in USA to start charging passengers for the actual cost of the trip they take--this is something I discuss frequently
-
-
At which point I would've been paying $24/day for my commute from Mountain View to Palo Alto instead of $10, and would've stopped taking the train and started driving. And that's a solo car, a family of four...
-
perhaps such a route isn't viable for train, then! but the only way to be sure is to see how many ride when the fare is correct--and on a related note, it is not just the cost of riding transit that is artificially depressed...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.