It wasn’t obvious to us that the company with the best use for Cellebrite would actually be Apple...pic.twitter.com/5H9O6PejFs
-
I can’t see how a device could break the law. It’s obviously got a ‘legitimate’ use which is quite mundane. Transferring data from phone A to phone B. I just found it interesting they use Cellebrite with the history of the two companies. No enemies in business though!
technically speaking, that device breaks into the security systems and has access to the user data (+ many other features). Of course it can be used for a legitimate scope. But it can be used in the same way for an unethical scope. I mean, really country-based stuff.
-
-
Technically speaking it doesn't. That's not a UFED, that's the device phone stores use to transfers contacts and texts over when you get a new phone. IE the phone is unlocked by the owner giving the device access, it doesn't break into it at all. Totally separate product
-
Not my field but it’s called the UFED Touch 2
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.