Ecstatic beyond reason that @NancyRomm decided to depend entirely on conjecture to write a piece that puts my life and the lives of people I care about in danger through implications she cannot back up with fact, on account of they're baseless
-
Show this thread
-
Let me break it down: there is no cabal. There is no organized syndicate in league with Antifa HQ There are journalists who understand a basic tenet of journalism (and life): to gain access to a story, avoid actively antagonizing and/or endangering the people whose story it is
2 replies 14 retweets 118 likesShow this thread -
When some major news network cites an anonymous source within the administration, are they engaging in nefarious practices? Of course not. The source spoke on condition of anonymity. No reasonable person bats an eye at that This is the same thing
3 replies 3 retweets 75 likesShow this thread -
It's true I don't film faces. Because journalistic integrity does not mean "do everything in your power to hurt your sources and then be shocked that your sources aren't a big fan of your work and don't want you around and refuse to grant you access"pic.twitter.com/Uhc5l7xygp
2 replies 6 retweets 95 likesShow this thread -
It's also true I have a point of view. I have opinions about these protests and I make them pretty clear. So do you, Nancy. Opinion journalism is a thing. I report facts and add color commentary. You do the same, except clearly without the "facts" part (at least in this article)
3 replies 2 retweets 87 likesShow this thread -
You didn't interview a single person for this article. You link to a spreadsheet which is actually not even remotely evidence of the kind of conspiracy you're implying And if that's what you think journalism is? Well, you're certainly right that we aren't doing the same thing
3 replies 4 retweets 106 likesShow this thread -
Anyway, congratulations on your byline and I'm very sorry you haven't found more success covering these protests by antagonizing the people you want to cover, I have to go write my mother apparently, thanks so much
4 replies 2 retweets 103 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @FarleyMedia
I'm not sure who you are, but I wasn't there for this incident
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @1misanthrophile
Anarcho Doggo Retweeted Anarcho Doggo
Just this chud...https://twitter.com/AnarchoDoggo/status/1300099559696158722?s=20 …
Anarcho Doggo added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Oh so like a bottom-feeding grifter who has to resort to shock imagery sent explicitly to people he knows will leak it because any attention is better than the nihilistic and ravenous emptiness within him? ...I dunno it's not ringing any bells, not sure I've ever heard of him
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.