Since it's a direct restriction on the 1A freedom of Press, I believe such a declaration would fall under 'Strict Constitutional Scrutiny', which for a bomb threat, could be legitimate. Caltrops, not so much. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/strict_scrutiny#:~:text=Strict%20scrutiny%20is%20a%20form,the%20constitutionality%20of%20certain%20laws.&text=To%20pass%20strict%20scrutiny%2C%20the,law%20to%20achieve%20that%20interest ….
-
-
-
And the wildest part is when they were actually claiming to have a bomb threat 2 nights ago they didn't completely close the road. They were letting people through whose cars were there, without bullrushing them in the process.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Camera drones start around $40 and then go up. I'd send you mine but i can't afford shipping.
-
I'd be careful. They'd likely put a few FN303 rounds through it, and then charge whoever was flying it with something.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
They definitely can't do that. Check out my website https://rightsandpress.org . I still have to do the part regarding freedom of the press vis-a-vis state action to restrain it. You should put the letters press written on a vest and, if they arrest you challenge the arrest in court
-
Of course they will dismiss the case but then take up an appeal on the ground that it is capable of repetition yet evading review.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Of course they will dismiss the case against you but you can take it up on appeal on the ground that it is capable of repetition yet evading review.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.