He takes an old-school attitude towards debate and freedom to express dissenting views. I might get in trouble for saying this, but I like it. One can be in favor of justice and free speech at the same time.https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/06/andrew-sullivan-is-there-still-room-for-debate.html …
It strikes me that if this author got this much space to write an article--a word count to turn writers around the world green with envy--he could in fact have engaged in the reasoned debate he claims is being silenced. It seems there's room for dissent here after all
-
-
(He could also view the debate over whether NYT should have platformed Tom Cotton's advocating using force to smash first amendment rights as a reasoned debate, which it very much is. After all, the NYT does not run every unhinged editorial they're sent)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.