I see zero or fewer things wrong here. We have testing, we have it at an accessible public place, we have needed revenue generation from a corporate sponsorship. What’s the problem?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Why does it fall to Pepsi to decide whether the benefits of advertising offset the cost of providing testing?
A world in which we are governed by corporations and not government is, I think, a hellscape and a gateway to feudalism. I agree that in this case it has produced a result that's net beneficial to society. But Jesus, what does it say about who holds all the power in this country?