My main point is that no one ever finishes the sentence, and I have a theory as to why but again, if I'm wrong, by all means explain it to me so I can be less wrong
Tell me how saving the economy will save more lives than letting it tank and avoiding 10% mortality rates like we're seeing in Italy We need specifics to have this conversation because the outcomes will be very fucking specific
-
-
We could stop every motor vehicle death tomorrow if we got rid of every car. But as a society we don’t because we recognize that there are myriad benefits to having motor vehicles including often saving people’s lives. We all handle that calculus without this level of dialogue.
-
It is literally the same conversation. People will die either way. Questioning whether all indirect costs, including loss of life, have been directly calculated is completely fair.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.