New goal: when people say "but we have to consider the economy...," don't let them trail off. Make them finish the sentence. Make them do the math on how many people they're advocating death for Make them confront their own true nature Make them say it out loud
Well, I think that if you say out loud what you're advocating it's pretty monstrous. But if relaxing the quarantine minimizes human suffering, you can easily prove me wrong by discussing how many people will die and/or suffer under the two methods
-
-
My main point is that no one ever finishes the sentence, and I have a theory as to why but again, if I'm wrong, by all means explain it to me so I can be less wrong
-
They are finishing the sentence though. I just finished the sentence, every argument I have seen finishes the sentence. I’m saying you’re deliberately misrepresenting the argument and I don’t know why. The end goal for both is minimizing human suffering. Neither is monstrous.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.