No (>>) operator in LWT? I found myself writing something like f () >>= const @@ g (). This could be f () >> g (), right? #OCaml
Replying to @EdgarArout
@EdgarArout thanks! I'll try lwt ppx.
1:03 AM - 28 Feb 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.