oh look! Yet another "news" source citing both-side-ism. How utterly boring - but a useful dodge when attempting to deflect from the fact that you have no true political analysis being conducted
It was a chaotic 90 minutes of personal attacks, persistent interruptions and little substantive debate on the issues plaguing a nation.
"We saw very little content about gender or marginalized people and a lot of masculine posturing."
From @emarvelous:https://19thnews.org/2020/09/trump-biden-first-presidential-debate-toxic-masculinit/?utm_campaign=19th-social&utm_content=it_was_a_chaotic_90_minut&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I know. It was difficult to hear Biden when he addressed these topics.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sorry, this is both sides-ism and does not underscore how the current WH occupant basically called for white supremacists to terrorize and “stand by” - it was a threat to BIPOC and nonwhite communities. How can your readers feel safe with this awful take? Do better.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it’s not an ordinary election - it’s fascism vs democracy and your both sides fails us all:https://twitter.com/JYSexton/status/1311297393200115713 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.