Number of research papers demonstrating car hacking in 2019: 0. Bonus fact: number of cars hacked maliciously ever: also 0.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
I know this definition leaves out a bunch of fun stuff such as key fob replay attacks, mobile app attacks, privacy violations, etc. But its my tweet so I make the rules. Honestly its because the attacks that affect physical safety are the most critical (and interesting).
Prikaži ovu nit -
Honorable mentions this year to the Pwn2Own attack against Tesla. This attacked the web browser but did not attempt to bypass the CAN gateway.https://techcrunch.com/2019/03/23/hackers-conquer-tesla-and-win-a-model-3/ …
Prikaži ovu nit -
A second honorable mention is to the
@keensec attack against the autopilot ECU in@Tesla vehicles. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/03/chinese-hackers-tricked-teslas-autopilot-into-switching-lanes.html …. .Prikaži ovu nit -
Hopefully we get some more research in 2020. Let me know how I can help make this happen!
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Is that why they won't assign a CVE to my vuln report that tires can easily be slashed?
-
they also rejected my DOS via brick through windshield
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Care to include opening and starting it without the key or manufacturer-designated device?
-
no, for me remotely hacking into and crashing a car is a totally different thing than merely unlocking a car. (bad guys can do the latter to my car if they want but i def don’t want them to do the former)
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Does the research have to be published for it to count?
-
it’s sorta hard to evaluate research that isn’t published...pic.twitter.com/6N8yfKlGzX
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.