Conversation

Very interested in this topic. But also cautious about tribal confirmation. What do we actually know about UFOs that we can independently replicate? Want to make sure we aren’t caught up in Gell-Mann amnesia. So much else of what NYT reports these days is false or distorted.

Quote Tweet

The New York Times

@nytimes

Jul 24, 2020

Despite Pentagon statements that it disbanded a once-covert program to investigate UFOs, it was in fact renamed and tucked inside the Office of Naval Intelligence nyti.ms/3eWmY5s

Balaji

@balajis

Jul 24, 2020

At least two explanations. 1) The catabolism of our institutions means all the secrets are coming out. Like the Katyn reveal at the end of the USSR. 2) Or, the same phenomenon is producing a breakdown in evidentiary standards across society. Want to believe! But need data.

Balaji

@balajis

Jul 24, 2020

As an example of what you can look at for yourself, here’s the UK government UFO archives: nationalarchives.gov.uk/ufos/ If this is real, we should push for an open sourcing of all primary data so the public (and scientists/engineers) can evaluate the raw evidence.

Antipodal Gray

@0xGray

My personal belief is that if reports are real they may be some sort of Von Neumann probes. Should be fairly easy and cheap for an advanced civilisation or alien AGI to coat the galaxy in drones. No biological occupants required

9:34 AM · Jul 24, 2020

Bookmark