Dear
If, as you claim, you have access to billions of dollars, scientists, technologists & Hollywood camera experts, why have you not done the analysis of the "UFO" videos did to at least consider quotidian terrestrial explanations?
youtube.com/watch?v=s1oTg0
Conversation
The answer seems obvious: Terrestrial explanations for what is on these three grainy & blurry videos doesn't make for good TV drama, & $$ investments in your To the Stars Academy will dry up. But isn't the truth more important than notoriety & wealth?
youtube.com/watch?v=PLyEO0
6
6
35
Why not be honest and balance your claim that these videos represent alien contact (or foreign assets) with competing hypotheses that they represent camera distortions, lens aberrations, & other such mundane phenomena?
youtube.com/watch?v=4Btns9
8
1
32
Look I agree DeLonge is a clown but do you honestly think the Pentagon hasn’t done more to find out what these are than Mick West in his garage?
I’ll take the pilots testimony and the investigative resources of the Pentagon, whether or not DeLonge is a side show
1
3
No of course not - but when the Pentagon’s *lack of ability to explain* supersedes Mick Wests explanations and the pilots description of events and movements operates outside the bounds of Mick West’s explanations then you have to concede how poor those explanations really are.
1
If you are saying that so far "we don't know". We have no argument. And, I apologize if I straw-manned you.
There was a slight suggestion that you were siding on .. therefore aliens.