tschneidereit
-
@ We should really do an example for XML config of . For now, look at the docs:
about 16 hours ago
from Tweetie
-
@ You can use [PostConstruct] metadata to denote methods to invoke after all injections.
11:11 AM Dec 10th
from Tweetie
in reply to troygilbert
-
Released SwiftSuspenders 1.0.1, containing a fix for Flash IDE-friendly XML config of ctor injection.
9:10 AM Dec 10th
from Tweetie
-
@ Support for issues can be activated for each fork. But since you want me to look at the issue, please open it on my fork.
8:37 AM Dec 10th
from Tweetie
in reply to _ondina
-
@ I should probably create a tender account for SwiftSuspenders, but for now, mail me or open a github ticket for problems.
7:11 AM Dec 10th
from Tweetie
in reply to _ondina
-
@ Let me know if you run into any issues. It's pretty stable, but it's not as well tested as the rest of SwiftSuspenders.
6:48 AM Dec 10th
from Tweetie
in reply to _ondina
-
.@ SwiftSuspenders has a solution in the childinjectors branch: Example usage here:
6:36 AM Dec 10th
from Tweetie
in reply to _ondina
-
Awesome: Nr. 35 on the top 500 supercomputer list is located in my street, 50 meters away from my flat
4:42 AM Dec 10th
from Tweetie
-
RT @: <~ robotlegs Nerd Merit Badge prototype... sweet! <- Oooh, I want one!
6:40 AM Dec 9th
from Tweetie
-
RT @: Beispiel mit Erklärungen für Services (MVCS) in gepostet. <- Sehr schöner Artikel!
9:34 AM Dec 7th
from Tweetie
-
RT @: - Robotlegs framework and programming to an interface
8:04 AM Dec 7th
from Tweetie
-
@ I moved the bug to the SwiftSuspenders bugtracker:
3:47 PM Dec 4th
from Tweetie
in reply to stevensacks
-
@ Thanks, will look into it. Really thought I had killed that one for good.
3:40 PM Dec 4th
from Tweetie
in reply to stevensacks
-
@ I know: Licenses are hard! Probably best to go with Nokias interpretation as they'd be the ones suing you ;)
3:40 AM Dec 4th
from Tweetie
in reply to richardleggett
-
@ Basically, as long as you dynamically link to Qt, you're fine. Static linking needs commercial license.
3:26 AM Dec 4th
from Tweetie
in reply to richardleggett
-
@ But you can sell closed source apps with LGPL Qt. That's the difference the L before GPL makes. See
3:25 AM Dec 4th
from Tweetie
in reply to richardleggett
-
@ I just discovered that Nokia have a good overview about the license stuff on their site:
3:10 AM Dec 4th
from Tweetie
in reply to richardleggett
-
@ Damn, I thought I had killed all of those. Please file a ticket in the github issue tracker.
1:50 AM Dec 4th
from Tweetie
in reply to stevensacks
-
@ (L)GPL only means free as in freedom, not necessarily as in beer. see red hat, suse, etc. selling linux-distributions.
10:46 AM Dec 3rd
from Echofon
in reply to richardleggett
-
@ yes, definitely.
10:40 AM Dec 3rd
from Echofon
in reply to richardleggett
|
|