Profile_bird

Hey there! tschneidereit is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving tschneidereit's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

tschneidereit

  1. @mattupstate We should really do an example for XML config of #robotlegs. For now, look at the #swiftsuspenders docs: http://tr.im/HkyA
  2. @troygilbert You can use [PostConstruct] metadata to denote methods to invoke after all injections. #robotlegs #swiftsuspenders
  3. Released SwiftSuspenders 1.0.1, containing a fix for Flash IDE-friendly XML config of ctor injection. http://tr.im/HeP1
  4. @_ondina Support for issues can be activated for each fork. But since you want me to look at the issue, please open it on my fork.
  5. @_ondina I should probably create a tender account for SwiftSuspenders, but for now, mail me or open a github ticket for problems.
  6. @_ondina Let me know if you run into any issues. It's pretty stable, but it's not as well tested as the rest of SwiftSuspenders.
  7. .@_ondina SwiftSuspenders has a solution in the childinjectors branch: http://tr.im/HdZR Example usage here: http://tr.im/He0a
  8. Awesome: Nr. 35 on the top 500 supercomputer list is located in my street, 50 meters away from my flat http://tr.im/Hdoc
  9. RT @jhooks: http://yfrog.com/37hnap <~ robotlegs Nerd Merit Badge prototype... sweet! <- Oooh, I want one!
  10. RT @fplag: Beispiel mit Erklärungen für Services (MVCS) in #Robotlegs gepostet. http://www.video-flash.de/?p=1556 <- Sehr schöner Artikel!
  11. RT @_ondina: #robotlegs http://tinyurl.com/ybd8zql - Robotlegs framework and programming to an interface
  12. @stevensacks I moved the bug to the SwiftSuspenders bugtracker: http://github.com/tschneidereit/SwiftSuspenders/issues/#issue/11
  13. @stevensacks Thanks, will look into it. Really thought I had killed that one for good.
  14. @richardleggett I know: Licenses are hard! Probably best to go with Nokias interpretation as they'd be the ones suing you ;)
  15. @richardleggett Basically, as long as you dynamically link to Qt, you're fine. Static linking needs commercial license.
  16. @richardleggett But you can sell closed source apps with LGPL Qt. That's the difference the L before GPL makes. See http://tr.im/GBPL
  17. @richardleggett I just discovered that Nokia have a good overview about the license stuff on their site: http://tr.im/GBMC
  18. @stevensacks Damn, I thought I had killed all of those. Please file a ticket in the #SwiftSuspenders github issue tracker.
  19. @richardleggett (L)GPL only means free as in freedom, not necessarily as in beer. see red hat, suse, etc. selling linux-distributions.
  20. @richardleggett yes, definitely.