sjancke
-
@ what is an alternative (inside WinForms) ?
8:37 AM Dec 16th
from web
in reply to BjoernRochel
-
@ perhaps lightsaber?
2:06 AM Dec 11th
from web
in reply to BjoernRochel
-
@ allerdings.
7:26 AM Nov 27th
from web
in reply to ralfw
-
Wie ist der Wechselkurs Emissionszertifikate - Bad code offsets ?
2:32 AM Nov 27th
from web
-
RT @ Ein Ablass für schlechten Code? <- ein neuer Zertifikathandel?
2:31 AM Nov 27th
from web
-
@ is the meeting on 10.12.2009 also at Microsoft Köln?
3:09 AM Nov 26th
from web
-
@ I missed that, while I really like Prodigy. Damn.
12:49 AM Nov 23rd
from web
in reply to BjoernRochel
-
@ right, so the purpose is really deciding and you can model with text + bubbles.
7:26 AM Nov 20th
from web
in reply to huettermann
-
@ mmh, some boxes, triangles, bubbles should be sufficient. Or do you prefer astronouts?
5:59 AM Nov 20th
from web
in reply to huettermann
-
@ where did you come across the "Iceberg class" idea? Are you still confident of it? I've implemented some static analysis for it.
4:53 AM Nov 20th
from web
-
need a reference for "Iceberg Class" Smell to cite. Can someone help?
3:01 AM Nov 20th
from web
-
@ why should microsoft support other persistence strategies? As long as it is extensible their decision is valid + reasonable
6:28 AM Nov 19th
from web
in reply to rainerschuster
-
@ that raises the question, if "Oslo" developed in a (for us: MDSD) useful direction...
2:13 AM Nov 19th
from web
in reply to rainerschuster
-
@ the renaming is a logical consequence of the development of "modelling" part of OSLO (Oslo was more than dsls/modelling)
2:12 AM Nov 19th
from web
in reply to rainerschuster
-
@ it's a problem of the project itself: e.g. VS integration still not bullet-proof
2:11 AM Nov 19th
from web
in reply to DerAlbert
-
feeling like my brain had a nuclear mind-meltdown yesterday...
1:21 AM Nov 19th
from web
-
@ we are thinking about ways to create a working, simpler, compact solution to get Maven support for .NET
1:18 AM Nov 19th
from web
in reply to DerAlbert
-
@ works on the command line, is hard to install into Visual Studio and it's implementation seems way to complex.
1:18 AM Nov 19th
from web
in reply to DerAlbert
-
@ sure. And btw it is raining here also...
1:35 AM Nov 13th
from web
in reply to ayende
-
@ l2sprof seems a bit "greyish", contrast is sometimes missing - at least on the screenshots.
1:31 AM Nov 13th
from web
in reply to ayende
|
|