setmajer
-
@ at -5° C it wouldn't be slop, though; it'd be frozen. ;-)
about 8 hours ago
from Twitterrific
in reply to bhenick
-
@ back again we come to validation…or are we just arguing 'necessary' vs 'helpful' (or similar)? also:
about 8 hours ago
from Twitterrific
-
@ Did you read 2nd link? in HTML5 JS is assumed if type attr/header is missing. Does that not match current browser behavior?
about 9 hours ago
from Twitterrific
in reply to isofarro_public
-
A late but strong entry for twat of the year:
about 9 hours ago
from Twitterrific
-
@ salt. wound.
about 10 hours ago
from Twitterrific
in reply to grahambeale
-
@ Every sperm is great!
about 11 hours ago
from Twitterrific
in reply to davehodg
-
WINNER: ♻ @ @ Consequently
about 11 hours ago
from Twitterrific
-
now I want chocolate — damn you, @
about 11 hours ago
from Twitterrific
-
@ @: FWIW, I'd agree with that as well; I just haven't (yet) seen an argument that the type attr is such a case
about 11 hours ago
from Twitterrific
in reply to mikewest
-
new Thai stand on Tower St. has a certain amount of WIN
about 11 hours ago
from Twitterrific
-
@ also: Cyril's point re: Firefox builds running Python; do servers ship configured to handle that?
about 11 hours ago
from Twitterrific
in reply to intranation
-
@ you're addressing the 'why require it' question again, unless you want to argue against validation
about 11 hours ago
from Twitterrific
in reply to nefarioustim
-
@ and all of them get set up correctly by someone who knows WTF they're doing, right?
about 11 hours ago
from Twitterrific
in reply to intranation
-
@ Crockford's point seems to be MIME types should be handled by server headers; not wrong, but a bit inflexible/idealistic
about 11 hours ago
from Twitterrific
in reply to cdoussin
-
@ but the OQ wasn't 'why is it required by the rec?' it was 'why use it?'; you're answering the first, not the OC
about 11 hours ago
from Twitterrific
in reply to isofarro_public
-
@ your argument seems to be 'browsers accept non-conforming code, therefore the spec is bad', or am I missing something?
about 12 hours ago
from Twitterrific
-
@ So you're arguing to change the spec, then? A rather different discussion, isn't it?
about 12 hours ago
from Twitterrific
in reply to isofarro_public
-
@ what, no 'move the needle'?
about 12 hours ago
from Twitterrific
in reply to darrenf
-
@ Condoms are murder!
about 12 hours ago
from Twitterrific
in reply to davehodg
-
*three* spam tweets from accounts with the 'britney'-sucking-cock avatar? This is getting entirely out of hand.
about 12 hours ago
from Twitterrific
|
- Name setmajer
- Location Half a bubble off plumb.
- Bio Born in a shithole, live in a hellhole. Is it any wonder I'm an asshole?
|
