Skip past navigation
On a mobile phone? Check out m.twitter.com!
Skip to navigation
Skip to sign in form

Hey there! rubymage is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What are you doing? Join today to start receiving rubymage's updates.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

rubymage

I think some people think you avoid having a single point of failure by having many single points of failure.8:21 AM Jul 11th from EventBox
@jicksta Awww... TEASE!4:58 PM Jul 1st from EventBox in reply to jicksta
@karawynn My SO and I used to read karawynn.net back in the puzzle-picture days. She's an aspiring SF writer, I just like brainy people.1:46 PM Jul 1st from EventBox in reply to karawynn
There's nothing like doing integration work between a MS Project Server instance and a Rails app to make you appreciate anything else.11:42 AM Jun 30th from EventBox
@bleything Especially given that most people I've asked cite disconnected commits as the most-compelling feature of Git.2:14 PM Jun 29th from EventBox in reply to bleything
@bleything Did the guard dog on your server poop where it wasn't supposed to?5:42 PM Jun 23rd from EventBox in reply to bleything
Ruby + Talisker = a good Sunday3:23 PM Jun 21st from EventBox
@bleything Congrats, man!12:39 PM Jun 1st from web
Can't stop listening to the new Metric album.4:09 PM May 15th from EventBox
@cypher Woo, yeah, okay.1:45 PM Apr 24th from EventBox in reply to cypher
@bleything Of course!1:43 PM Apr 24th from EventBox in reply to bleything
Considering writing a little guide for porting a Ruby 1.8.x extension to Ruby 1.9.1. Would anyone else be interested?1:38 PM Apr 24th from EventBox
@david_a_black Hi!1:33 PM Apr 24th from EventBox in reply to david_a_black
@objo I agree. I'm just saying that the arguments are different. Code is an instrument of communication, an editor is not.1:26 PM Apr 24th from EventBox in reply to objo
@srbaker I would agree re:simplicity, but there's such a thing as too simple. Omitting explicit receivers IMO makes code less skimmable.1:22 PM Apr 24th from EventBox in reply to srbaker
@srbaker Twice already today in Sequel alone. And not very much effort in isolation, mostly because Jeremy's code is nicer than most.1:21 PM Apr 24th from EventBox in reply to srbaker
@david_a_black Interesting. I stand corrected.1:20 PM Apr 24th from EventBox in reply to david_a_black
@david_a_black Not if self defines a #foo= method. Which illustrates my point exactly.1:11 PM Apr 24th from EventBox in reply to david_a_black
@objo Just like the "editor argument" isn't an issue until you pair with someone that uses a different one.1:10 PM Apr 24th from EventBox in reply to objo
@objo It's an academic argument only as long as neither of us has to read the other's code.1:09 PM Apr 24th from EventBox in reply to objo

Name Michael Granger
Location 45.365067, -122.834183
Web http://deveiate.org/
Bio Ruby hacker. RPG fan. Believer. Cook. Beebedkneemaker

RSS feed of rubymage's updates