rortybomb
-
@ like Shiller's plan. It's beyond literacy, it's more like going to court without a lawyer. Too complex for general schooling.
2:09 PM Nov 24th
from web
-
@ One way to deal with fin literacy would be to give everyone a kind of Financial Public Defender option:
2:09 PM Nov 24th
from web
-
More financial amendment fun. Felix Salmon on Miller-Moore @
1:16 PM Nov 24th
from web
-
That's right. We are digging into OTC Bill amendments. Join me with the Lynch Amendment - it's awesome!
10:47 AM Nov 24th
from web
-
Serious re: . Red bull, target mkting, faux lesbians. 00s sucked. rt @ "From t.A.T.u. to TFLN: Our Regrettable Decade."
8:04 PM Nov 23rd
from web
-
I want to write a counterintuitive piece for slate on t.A.T.u. being the best band for understanding the 00s:
7:49 PM Nov 23rd
from web
-
@ @ but it ends up trapping it into human feature land; I didn't get a great sense of their practices or larger macropicture.
7:42 PM Nov 23rd
from web
-
@ @ that is pretty good; I like the idea of transitioning between places in Rosin as a proxy of moving btwn keynesian regimes.
7:40 PM Nov 23rd
from web
-
Take this nanny state - bathtub Sparks Energy Drink.
11:16 AM Nov 19th
from web
-
RT @ NOO! RT @: Tuesday's post is the last from me as Opinionator. Daily blog is ending. Thanks all. It's been fun.
9:29 AM Nov 18th
from web
-
Late & everyone's already taxied over to the AIG party, but my long response to @ previous thing
7:50 AM Nov 18th
from web
-
Have I mentioned how much I'm enjoying "The Crisis of Imprisonment"? Let me do it again
8:16 AM Nov 17th
from web
-
"Save the University", Wendy Brown talk. First talk I've seen her give, great stuff.
5:13 PM Nov 14th
from web
-
@ fwiw I find this short paper an excellent topic for EMH chats and focusing one's thinking on subject
5:03 PM Nov 14th
from web
-
excellent stuff rt @ interesting post on Ratzinger and Marxism (and Heidegger for good measure):
10:03 PM Nov 13th
from web
-
@ Current academic research re: liquidity is terrible; That we can agree on!
6:13 PM Nov 13th
from web
-
@ true, big question. But before that I'm not sure L($1.6tn) > 16L($100bn). 5 Baby Goldmans may give nearly same liquidity?
6:11 PM Nov 13th
from web
-
@ Ah, so there's no data, (and basic Coase tells us otherwise re: internal noise) but simpleton bloggers should accept it?
6:02 PM Nov 13th
from web
-
@ "no liquidity" = they don't consider it, tough to measure; Liquidity($1,000bn) > 10*Liquidity(100bn) is testable perhaps.
5:57 PM Nov 13th
from web
-
@ This is current research, no liquidity IRTS overall through $.5bn agreed; more dpnding on methods
5:56 PM Nov 13th
from web
|
- Name Mike
- Location SF
- Web http://rortybomb....
- Bio Modeling. Of the mature, yet tasteful, variety. Finance/Econ Blogger.
|