rjolly
-
@ C-x Mc-C M-?
12:37 PM Feb 11th
from TwitKit
-
localradio history:
12:26 PM Feb 11th
from TwitKit
-
@ 'have been'? we are still looking
1:45 PM Jan 23rd
from TwitKit
-
@ you can model anything, but is is always lossy
11:53 AM Jan 23rd
from TwitKit
-
@ was it the best scrum ever?
4:03 AM Nov 27th, 2008
from TwitKit
in reply to OvidPerl
-
@ so why did they use sifr?
3:28 AM Nov 26th, 2008
from TwitKit
in reply to fantasticlife
-
@ great!
2:57 AM Nov 18th, 2008
from TwitKit
in reply to hellomatty
-
no email, phone or paycheck!
7:42 AM Nov 17th, 2008
from TwitKit
-
@ why sad? just sounds like work in an iterative world
7:41 AM Nov 17th, 2008
from TwitKit
in reply to OvidPerl
-
@ neal's yard dairy?
9:10 AM Nov 15th, 2008
from TwitKit
in reply to craigwebster
-
mmm coffee and clips, er cake
5:30 AM Nov 15th, 2008
from TwitKit
-
@ ... or rather, sort of. We are getting closer.
8:28 AM Nov 14th, 2008
from TwitKit
in reply to fidothe
-
@ no
8:26 AM Nov 14th, 2008
from TwitKit
in reply to fidothe
-
@ credits for programmes are in topics?
2:25 AM Nov 14th, 2008
from TwitKit
in reply to fantasticlife
-
@ ;)
10:04 AM Nov 13th, 2008
from TwitKit
in reply to craigwebster
-
@ I spoke to @ about this. We want to take a look
9:57 AM Nov 13th, 2008
from TwitKit
in reply to craigwebster
-
@ congrats.
4:47 AM Nov 13th, 2008
from TwitKit
in reply to rijam
-
@ if we only accepted valid data we would have any ;)
4:09 AM Nov 13th, 2008
from TwitKit
in reply to OvidPerl
-
@ db is more complicated, but model may be simpler
8:34 AM Nov 12th, 2008
from TwitKit
in reply to R4isStatic
-
@, 201 for all is useless. Isn't there a multiple code option?
8:34 AM Nov 12th, 2008
from TwitKit
in reply to jonathantweed
|
|