raynetoday
-
RT @ It took the biotech industry 42 Representatives parroting their talking points to try to refute...
26 minutes ago
from web
-
@ Can't believe Wolfram wants its answer product (not a search tool) to be likewise branded as wingnut-preferred...
about 20 hours ago
from web
-
@ MSFT puts itself in a branding bind by coming to Murdoch's rescue; does it really want to be seen as search tool of wingnuts?
about 20 hours ago
from web
in reply to JayAckroyd
-
@ what's murdoch's wsj.com got that reuters, bloomberg, ft.com don't have? aspirations to be even smaller, like barrons?
about 22 hours ago
from web
-
@ wsj.com has lagged other financial outlets, cutting off google search will not improve traffic especially if behind paywall
about 22 hours ago
from web
-
@ re: @ & "mistreated" newspapers - just compare traffic numbers of murdoch's wsj.com w/ reuters.com, bloomberg.com
about 22 hours ago
from web
-
@ Get email/text device! very happy with voice-only and my PEEK. Hoping PEEK will do data sometime soon.
10:58 AM Nov 13th
from web
in reply to om
-
RT @ Everyone at is thrilled at the launch today of ...This is big. || Good, important stuff.
8:35 AM Nov 12th
from web
-
RT @ Why not pay for what works? Because Betsy McCaughey said...|| Ugh. Betsy said no, of course.
7:59 PM Nov 11th
from web
-
via @ RT @: I'd love to offer Lou Dobbs a job as a day laborer. || Maybe Dobbs took up McCain's lettuce-picking offer?
7:23 PM Nov 11th
from web
-
@ My kid says he'll be in COD Modern Warfare 2 shortly, see you there...
4:25 PM Nov 10th
from web
in reply to MattOrtega
-
@ Re: email folder/tag for "maybe" -- how about using del.icio.us and save the status link for key tweets to a new bookmark?
4:23 PM Nov 10th
from web
in reply to mediajunkie
-
@ Re: Bart Stupak - was a good Dem up until he decided to violate First Amendment and demand religious dictates for health care.
1:51 PM Nov 7th
from web
in reply to n1rm
-
@ Shadegg's baby meat puppetry: yeah, Palin-esque. Has to mooch charm he doesn't personally possess. Surprised he didn't use a dog
1:49 PM Nov 7th
from web
in reply to emptywheel
-
Why worry about nanoparticulates? NO INDUSTRY STANDARDS FOR HANDLING. NO REALISTIC MSDS. Just for starters.
11:19 AM Nov 6th
from web
-
HELL YES RT @ Some nanoparticles can harm cells without being in contact with them: should you be worried?
11:18 AM Nov 6th
from web
-
RT @ Bachmann: IHOP threatens American pancake exceptionalism. || Bet she asks "Where's Aunt Jemima's birth certificate" next.
10:28 AM Nov 6th
from web
-
But let's go one further: all papers and research funded by public money at public schools? PUBLIC DOMAIN - including pharma.
10:26 AM Nov 6th
from web
-
n1rm
via @ RT @: RT @: You know, it's really ridiculous that all academic papers aren't freely available. | A-yup.
10:25 AM Nov 6th
from web
-
RT @ "at-Largely: 3, 2, 1... attack Obama over the Fort Hood shooting" | You forgot to add the tag ;-)
10:22 AM Nov 6th
from web
|
- Name raynetoday
- Web http://rayne-toda...
- Bio 160 characters isn't enough to define realized and unrealized potential, don't you agree?
|