Profile_bird

Hey there! pekadad is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving pekadad's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

pekadad

  1. At my son's first high school swim meet-he just won his heat of the 50 free! Woo hoo!
  2. @stangarfield Thanks. Good discussion, everyone - thanks to all of you, too! #KMers
  3. @stangarfield Yes - This has been a good discussion on 3 of the 13 (with touches on a few of the others) #KMers
  4. @stangarfield FWIW - my (much longer) thoughts on perf mgmt and KM: http://bit.ly/80u0Zz #KMers
  5. @lehawes re: tough to set goals - Indeed! But even informally showing interest (by a mgr) in KM activities can be a powerful force #KMers
  6. @kcbower: RT I would think it would stifle #innovation. > I think so, too - at least disincentives it #KMers
  7. @mneff I like the idea of non-monetary incentives - often just formal acknowledgment can be sufficient. #KMers
  8. @VMaryAbraham Possibly. In any corporate env I've worked in, I have had to sign the "All your thoughts are belong to us" form, tho #KMers
  9. @mneff Does your organization use incentives as part of your innovation activities? Does anyone else? #KMers
  10. @stangarfield Users need to be part of the "iteration" and will to (potentially) lose content when it's too expensive to carry along #KMers
  11. @stangarfield Once in production, content/knowledge apps bring along a lot of "migration" headaches that can slow down more iteration #KMers
  12. @stangarfield A detractor from "experiment&iterate" is that all apps are "legacy apps" once in production. #KMers
  13. RT @VMaryAbraham: Quick iteration/quick fail is so foreign to many IT/KM operations. > Sad, but true! #KMers
  14. @mneff How do you know knowledge velocity increases? It seems like it would be the opposite (too many 'good' ideas to consider). #KMers
  15. @VMaryAbraham Ah - but a taxonomy is "official" - I'm free to let you have your own tags and just ignore those :-) #KMers
  16. @stangarfield Another integrating 'technology' is the simple link - you can achieve a lot simply by being able to link to a resource #KMers
  17. @stangarfield Search is helped with taxonomy - no real visibility yet on folksonomy but (if used well) I could see it doing the same #KMers
  18. @Ridgehead I think search is definitely a content/knowledge integrator. Whether "enterprise" or federated. #KMers
  19. @stangarfield Integration for knowledge (or content) often (to me) means taxonomy (or perhaps even ontologies) more than technologies #KMers
  20. @Ridgehead And is that snow heading to Detroit? #KMers