niravn1
-
I just generated my out of a year of my tweets. Top three words: scala, eclipse, java -
7:55 AM Nov 29th
from Tweet Cloud
-
Time to play some AOE and Civ 4, after a long break of 4months.
11:12 AM Nov 26th
from web
-
Without some form of smart type inference anonymous lamda expression in JDK is going to suck for reference types.
3:39 PM Nov 18th
from web
-
Adding closures to Java is starting to sound like reforming health care!
3:31 PM Nov 18th
from web
-
@ that's pretty addictive!
6:35 PM Nov 17th
from web
in reply to cbeust
-
Is that a lot to ask?
4:30 PM Nov 12th
from web
-
I am dreaming about a pluggable language platform... Where I can pick type system, GC, run time, concurrency, grammar in manner I want...
4:30 PM Nov 12th
from web
-
of course far far better than pthreads in C.
3:34 PM Nov 11th
from web
-
channels in go look more like actors and far primitive
3:33 PM Nov 11th
from web
-
Only google can sell a language with fast compilation speeds...
3:30 PM Nov 11th
from web
-
Three design decisions in "go" I don't like: maps, slices as special cases. missing exceptions, function returning multiple values.
3:30 PM Nov 11th
from web
-
@ 'UML' and 'useful' are oxymoron :)
4:25 PM Nov 2nd
from web
in reply to abstratt
-
RT @ If you want to take full advantage of type inference, use val instead of var.
6:04 AM Oct 25th
from twidroid
-
@ about dynamic casts. if you don't like it, you will absolutely hate developing on eclipse platform.
6:04 AM Oct 25th
from twidroid
in reply to djspiewak
-
@ that is vague, try WTP enterprise app with 4 validation and other builders on the project.
11:16 AM Oct 16th
from twidroid
in reply to caniszczyk
-
RT @ RT @: Why Erlang-style concurrency is not the One True Way:
4:57 AM Oct 5th
from twidroid
-
RT @ Cliff Click on "Java vs C performance... again..." with some benchmarks
6:21 AM Sep 8th
from twidroid
-
@ I will eat my words when PIM->PSM dumbs down excruciating details of programming to the point of irrelavance :)
6:31 AM Sep 5th
from twidroid
in reply to abstratt
-
@ UML activity modeling, action semantics, petrinet, fsm are not enough to model complex workflow without resorting to programming.
6:28 AM Sep 5th
from twidroid
in reply to abstratt
-
@ how would you model non functional requirements? caching, performance, security etc still takes the large part of dev time.
10:14 PM Sep 4th
from web
|
|
