Profile_bird

Hey there! nex3 is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving nex3's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

nex3

  1. @friedcell @mytix Why do you say that? You can't use Sass without understanding CSS deeply, let alone design it
  2. @d_run It's perfectly possible to use Sass and Compass with python via the command-line interfaces.
  3. @garethr The syntax is more scary than it is difficult. But the new syntax will hopefully be implemented in dev in the next few months
  4. @thibaut_barrere No, I'm a developer - I write Haml. But I've talked to a lot of designers who swear by it
  5. @dmosher May I see your presentation?
  6. @randomcodenz Sass is actually great for designers. See http://chriseppstein.github...
  7. @fidothe @garethr @danwrong Sass 2.4 will support a CSS-like syntax. And it's much more stable and robust than Less
  8. @sgruhier @thibaut_barrere Designers often like Haml more than developers since they think about HTML in terms of CSS and document structure
  9. RT @changelogshow: We also released a "Spotlight" podcast recently with @chriseppstein and @nex3 on #haml, #sass and #compass: http://bi ...
  10. @dagda1 Are you sure you're running in development mode? In production, it only updates once. If that's not it, email haml@groups.google.com
  11. @dagda1 Rails should automatically compile. If it's not, make sure you have the plugin properly installed. If it's still not, let me know
  12. @bangpound Not built in, although you could write e yourself. Why do you need it?
  13. @benjaminpearson If you find one, let me know; I'd love to try modifying it to actually follow the links
  14. @dagda1 @DaveTheNinja Less isn't based on Sass, except in spirit. Sass came first; Less did a similar thing with different syntax
  15. @davcamer I don't know... the lack of a Ruby dependency is the biggest thing I can imagine
  16. @joshprice I'm interested to hear how that went. Any hiccups? What would make it even easier to use without Ruby?
  17. @davcamer No, on purpose: that screws up caching and causes serious slowdowns of websites. You never need it anyway 'cause of Sass functions
  18. @davcamer I never understood the point of porting Sass (or Less). They're perfectly usable with non-Ruby frameworks already
  19. @tdreyno @chriseppstein I agree with Chris, although I'm open to being convinced otherwise. Let's discuss it on the Haml google group
  20. @wpbasti In that case, mixins are exactly what you want. Check out Compass's CSS3 module: http://bit.ly/6dQRTm