nex3
-
@ @ Why do you say that? You can't use Sass without understanding CSS deeply, let alone design it
about 1 hour ago
from web
in reply to friedcell
-
@ It's perfectly possible to use Sass and Compass with python via the command-line interfaces.
about 7 hours ago
from web
in reply to d_run
-
@ The syntax is more scary than it is difficult. But the new syntax will hopefully be implemented in dev in the next few months
about 23 hours ago
from web
in reply to garethr
-
@ No, I'm a developer - I write Haml. But I've talked to a lot of designers who swear by it
1:09 AM Nov 27th
from web
in reply to thibaut_barrere
-
@ May I see your presentation?
12:09 AM Nov 27th
from web
in reply to dmosher
-
@ Sass is actually great for designers. See
2:43 PM Nov 26th
from web
in reply to randomcodenz
-
@ @ @ Sass 2.4 will support a CSS-like syntax. And it's much more stable and robust than Less
1:16 PM Nov 26th
from web
in reply to fidothe
-
@ @ Designers often like Haml more than developers since they think about HTML in terms of CSS and document structure
1:15 PM Nov 26th
from web
in reply to sgruhier
-
RT @: We also released a "Spotlight" podcast recently with @ and @ on , and :
...
3:00 PM Nov 25th
from web
-
@ Are you sure you're running in development mode? In production, it only updates once. If that's not it, email haml@groups.google.com
5:21 PM Nov 24th
from web
in reply to dagda1
-
@ Rails should automatically compile. If it's not, make sure you have the plugin properly installed. If it's still not, let me know
3:12 PM Nov 24th
from web
in reply to dagda1
-
@ Not built in, although you could write e yourself. Why do you need it?
11:39 PM Nov 23rd
from web
in reply to bangpound
-
@ If you find one, let me know; I'd love to try modifying it to actually follow the links
11:35 PM Nov 23rd
from web
in reply to benjaminpearson
-
@ @ Less isn't based on Sass, except in spirit. Sass came first; Less did a similar thing with different syntax
2:45 PM Nov 23rd
from web
in reply to dagda1
-
@ I don't know... the lack of a Ruby dependency is the biggest thing I can imagine
2:24 AM Nov 23rd
from web
in reply to davcamer
-
@ I'm interested to hear how that went. Any hiccups? What would make it even easier to use without Ruby?
11:41 PM Nov 22nd
from web
in reply to joshprice
-
@ No, on purpose: that screws up caching and causes serious slowdowns of websites. You never need it anyway 'cause of Sass functions
11:41 PM Nov 22nd
from web
in reply to davcamer
-
@ I never understood the point of porting Sass (or Less). They're perfectly usable with non-Ruby frameworks already
8:32 PM Nov 22nd
from web
in reply to davcamer
-
@ @ I agree with Chris, although I'm open to being convinced otherwise. Let's discuss it on the Haml google group
4:55 PM Nov 22nd
from web
in reply to tdreyno
-
@ In that case, mixins are exactly what you want. Check out Compass's CSS3 module:
4:52 PM Nov 22nd
from web
in reply to wpbasti
|
|