naontiotami
-
@ Supposedly he convinced this theist I met on Twitter to abandon atheism. Skimmed the args. - they don't seem that great.
15 minutes ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to Epigrammist
-
@ It won't hurt you.
about 2 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to dreadpiratemick
-
I... I think I'm going to have to renew my prescription!
about 2 hours ago
from API
-
@ Your time - what, the 90s? ;) I think that distinction has existed for at least four years.
about 2 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to briandgregory
-
@ Then they are newbs, not noobs - not sure how a JoCo noob would work... They fail to remember lyrics or something?
about 2 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to briandgregory
-
Oh Amazon, you know what I want for Christmas, don't you?
about 2 hours ago
from TweetDeck
-
@ I don't read with prejudice - I'm open to being convinced. But bad arguments won't win favours from me.
about 2 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to OregonYankee
-
So when I get some time, under the direction of @, I'm reading some Aquinas. Supposedly I'll be convinced God exists. We'll see.
about 2 hours ago
from TweetDeck
-
@ ...familiar. Most are very close to other arguments that apologists have used that I have found flawed or unconvincing.
about 3 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to OregonYankee
-
@ Actually, I had heard of him, but I hadn't read him arguments. However, now I know vaguely what they're about, they seem...
about 3 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to OregonYankee
-
@ Okay then. Twitter's not really an appropriate medium. I'll write a blog post when I track down some authentic Aquinas.
about 3 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to OregonYankee
-
RT @: Are HAARP conspiracists known as HAARPies? | They are now!
about 3 hours ago
from TweetDeck
-
@ Oh, and my last name is spelt "Scanlan". That's a common mistake.
about 3 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to OregonYankee
-
@ For Arg. 4, does God respresent every maximum value? It seems to follow from Aquinas's reasoning.
about 3 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to OregonYankee
-
@ Of course. Then again, what I said wasn't actually logical inconsistent. Aquinas claimed something, and I took that to a conc.
about 3 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to OregonYankee
-
@ You seem to think I'm not a serious person. But serious yet silly arguments do not have to be treated with a straight face.
about 3 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to OregonYankee
-
@ I'm not giving up, I'm letting my followers know what I'm doing! Is there anything wrong with that?
about 3 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to OregonYankee
-
@ No I didn't - only if Ken Ham, Kent Hovind and Ray Comfort were arguing with me.
about 3 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to dreadpiratemick
-
@ I would assume that the meaning of "grand old time" is clear - I don't need help.
about 3 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to JuanitaBerguson
-
Having a grand old time with @, @ and @.
about 3 hours ago
from TweetDeck
|
- Name Jack Scanlan
- Location Melbourne, Australia
- Web http://naontiotam...
- Bio Evolution enthusiast, wannabe scientist, skeptical blogger, atheist, musician, high school student, (75%) heterosexual male, possibly socially broken
|
