Profile_bird

Hey there! mzelinger is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving mzelinger's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

mzelinger

  1. @denalstevens totally passing this on to the boss!
  2. Sean Paige votes for budget...passes 5-4, complete wrap up on krdo.com and NEWSCHANNEL 13 at 10
  3. 4-4, newest council member Sean Paige will be deciding vote
  4. Bernie Herpin supports budget despite stormwater enterprise phase out concern. Council was going to phase out by 2011...DBruce says now.
  5. 4-3 AGAINST budget...only Paige and Herpin left to vote
  6. @denalstevens ha! my dad might disagree with you about me and no crap ;) Thanks!
  7. Mayor Rivera will support budget, doesn't like cuts, but knows there are limited funds
  8. right now 4-2 AGAINST current budget... needs 5 to pass
  9. Tom Gallagher won't support budget because of stormwater questions, transit cuts
  10. Jan Martin won't support budget because of two year phase out of stormwater enterprise
  11. Randy Purvis will not support budget
  12. Darryl Glenn will vote no because of questions over stormwater enterprise phase out concerns, otherwise would have voted yes
  13. Scott Hente will vote in favor of the budget with "reservations" says we should balance the budget on the backs of employees
  14. Larry Small moves to vote on the final budget, with vacation days removed, transit cut nights/weekends, pools shut down...etc.
  15. before final vote, budget must be amended for stormwater enterprise phase out and vacation time reduction
  16. VOTE TIME!
  17. council and douglas bruce in a bit of a shouting match, although bruce generally not allowed to respond
  18. darryl glenn wants to end stormwater enterprise at the end of this year instead of 2011, or he will vote against the budget.
  19. doug bruce speaking to council about issue 300...and how it should be interpreted
  20. otherwise, that $875,000 could have been spent on aquatic center...or transit...or less impact on city employees