Profile_bird

Hey there! mjbkr is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving mjbkr's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

mjbkr

  1. Hard get philosophy done in a cafe when the barista in charge of music is a big aerosmith fan.
  2. @Juan For me that is sufficient reason to never do it!
  3. @john_s_wilkins Good advice. And there is more than just poor spelling and grammar to endure!
  4. Is wondering if it is generally unwise to assign long term papers in introductory philosophy classes.
  5. 3 of the events I most deeply regret occurred in the mid-90s: sold my Primus CDs, endorsed ethical relativism & voted conservative
  6. Trying to find a way that (at least some) intuitions are evidence for (at least some) intuitions being evidentially irrelevant.
  7. I'm working at a wine cafe. Employee is sitting with a wine distributor, tasting from about 15 of his bottles. Considering a career change.
  8. Can anyone tell me how the 1st episode of this Darwin series was?: http://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/natureofthings/2009/darwin/
  9. Canadian novel about Aristotle up for many awards: http://bit.ly/26BzB9
  10. New legal protection for some "philosophical beliefs": http://bit.ly/1L07v6
  11. Looking for seminal discussions of the principle of total evidence, by someone without the name Carnap or Good.
  12. My twitter account was hacked. If you got a direct message from me, ignore it and do not click on the link in it.
  13. @AllenStairs It may have to be over several beers. I'm still quite unsure about what to think on issues like this.
  14. @AllenStairs 2/2 explain some things, and origin too. Scientific explanation then isn't enough when scientific classifications disagree
  15. @AllenStairs 1/2 The case is an abstract way of exploring disagreement between different ways of classifying. Everyone agrees that genes
  16. @AllenStairs 2/2 But there are *actual* cases of origin classifications and gene classifications disagreeing. Doesn't classification matter?
  17. @AllenStairs 1/2 Maybe we're talking past one another. Lots of biologists presume wholly relational essentialism (only origin makes a tiger)
  18. @AllenStairs 3/2 ...whether these arguments end in truths, whether the truths are relevant, and if relevant, say for who.
  19. @AllenStairs 2/2 Those are what need defending by us. And, given others' arguments that there are essences, we should defend a stand on...
  20. @AllenStairs 1/2 Doesn't this presume an account of explanation, and an account of such explanation being all we need?