Profile_bird

Hey there! mentalartist is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What are you doing? Join today to start receiving mentalartist's updates.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

mentalartist

  1. The only domestic US airline that doesn't suck is Virgin America. All others could learn a lot from them.
  2. @chris_stevenson I prefer a red dot http://is.gd/1Cmah sight for my peashooter.
  3. @ross_niemi http://www.hip-nosis.info/ also comes highly recommended from a source I trust, but I haven't studied from him myself.
  4. @ross_niemi I recommend learning in person or via video from either http://trucor.com/ or http://omnihypnosis.com/
  5. @ross_niemi I've read every hypnosis book I can find, in or out of print, and I can't recommend *any* of them to a beginner.
  6. Join my Aardvark network http://vark.com/s/8QsY ... I answer Qs about *Technology* *Self Defense* and *Hypnosis*
  7. @jaycfields Sure thing. Let me know if you run into any issues.
  8. @jaycfields If you are Ant savvy it shouldn't be a problem. Panopticode 0.1 is essentially a custom doclet run through Ant.
  9. @jaycfields If that's useful for you then Panopticode 0.1 is good to go. Otherwise it will likely be sometime before the next release.
  10. @jaycfields The next version of Panopticode will break compatibility with the current output file format and the plugin API.
  11. @jaycfields Panopticode 0.1 can create interactive and static treemap visualizations of your code coverage and cyclomatic complexity.
  12. @jaycfields Panopticode 0.1 supports correlating metrics from Emma, CheckStyle, JDepend, JavaNCSS, and Simian into a unified XML file.
  13. @jaycfields Nothing much is going on with Panopticode these days. The released version is solid, but limited in scope. Why do you ask?
  14. @alexRuiz @charley_baker What I really want is a 'component' in Java with better encapsulation than a package, but more complex than a class
  15. @alexRuiz @charley_baker Complexity exists. It's all about the tradeoffs in organizing it.
  16. @charley_baker It is definitely too complicated.
  17. Fight Club is for pansies. http://www.dogbrothers.com/...
  18. @pkreeves Yes it does :)
  19. Did you know that Java doesn't allow you to create an inner interface inside an inner class?
  20. @tastapod That's absurd! All good shops write software to pass their unit tests, not to pass QA.