Profile_bird

Hey there! megmagdah is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What are you doing? Join today to start receiving megmagdah's updates.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

megmagdah

  1. Today = underdog win.
  2. I want to be at this place: http://www.flickr.com/photo...
  3. I am listening to the calls of sundry birds from the UK. #bliss #birD
  4. @rojopelo I have a total soft spot for your group of early '90s music.
  5. PARCEL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  6. CREPES.
  7. @heldermira I'M TELLING YOU NOW.
  8. Staff meetings. ... I'm going to reward myself with crepes from the farmers market at Billings Forge. Impending #foodmistake.
  9. http://twitpic.com/9q9o6 -
  10. @bahocker I still have the text from last year's baby bunnies! I want to masticate carrots for them!
  11. - even if that audience is only the creator at a later time...if that makes sense.
  12. @Harry_Who I think that if art is about meaning, in part, than it has to involve creator(s), message, and audience -
  13. @Harry_Who I really don't think it's sufficient to use intention to define art. #intentionalfallacy
  14. Uncontrollable Beauty: http://bit.ly/qwEt0
  15. I just think that art has to be a flexible assignation, one based on discursive subscription.
  16. In part.
  17. I agree with Michael.
  18. @bahocker I just want a more open definition of art than one tied up exclusively in intention.
  19. @bahocker Remind me of the author of that great essay on beauty of which this whole exchange reminds me?
  20. @jillianQ It seems to me that art is a discourse, so alignment to a discourse could happen through any participant, producer or consumer.