maymaym
-
@ FTR, I greatly appreciate your persistence with . My opinions on recording issues are mine+unchanging. You did a great job.
17 minutes ago
from Brizzly
in reply to nikolasco
-
Catching up w/ reactions on blogs, Twitter, FetLife, etc. Awesomeness prevails! But I've work to do, so I'll see you later, Internet.
about 5 hours ago
from identica
-
@ I love that you+others want people to show up to @ yet I don't think we need to compromise or appease to succeed in it.
about 7 hours ago
from Brizzly
in reply to nikolasco
-
@ Are you serious? No events are more prone to than ones you call . TNG's young is 35 for christsake!
about 7 hours ago
from Brizzly
in reply to BritLuckyPaul
-
New blog post: Sexual Adultism at KinkForAll Washington DC I finished uploading the of my presentation at
about 19 hours ago
from identica
-
@ What's wrong w/presumption coupled w/active effort to inform? @'s NOTHING like "prevailing norms" of alt sex community.
about 19 hours ago
from Brizzly
in reply to nikolasco
-
New blog post: Sexual Adultism at KinkForAll Washin...
about 20 hours ago
from Twitter Tools
-
@ It's a tough issue. Given the nature of @, etc., I strongly favor simplicity. Clarity is paramount. Assume good faith.
about 22 hours ago
from Brizzly
in reply to raxvulpine
-
@ I see. Still think act of showing up shows intent. Onus should be on us to communicate best we can to help folk make THAT choice.
about 23 hours ago
from Brizzly
in reply to nikolasco
-
@ Ppl changed stickers frm "opt-out" to "opt-in" @ . Blog post: Many REGRETTED not recording their talks.
about 23 hours ago
from Brizzly
in reply to raxvulpine
-
@ I'm not sure I follow. Explicit choice != more responsible decision-making & the pester factor = barrier to smooth communication.
about 23 hours ago
from Brizzly
in reply to nikolasco
-
@ Of course! It changed . I still think it was a mistake—note how many participants changed their stickers mid-way thru. ;)
about 23 hours ago
from Brizzly
in reply to raxvulpine
-
@ There are MANY reasons why some won't come to @. Why make rules to placate THOSE folks but not do the same for others?
about 23 hours ago
from Brizzly
in reply to raxvulpine
-
@ Exactly. Doing that is an obvious and clear indication of a desire to participate. Why add extra barriers like photo "policies"?
about 23 hours ago
from Brizzly
in reply to raxvulpine
-
@ Don't see a diff btw "opt" & "opt-in." If required to do that, you're minimally required to opt-in to participate. Not the same.
about 24 hours ago
from Brizzly
in reply to raxvulpine
-
@ I appreciate that, which is why communication clarity is paramount. I personally think opt-in is a mistake, but did that.
about 24 hours ago
from Brizzly
in reply to nikolasco
-
@ Til I see tourists walking around w/cameras AND model releases on streets, I'm unconvinced opt-in is appropriate for @.
12:57 PM Nov 23rd
from Brizzly
in reply to nikolasco
-
@ I'm not personally cool w/that. Public events like should be public. There's no opt-in on a street, so too at @.
12:44 PM Nov 23rd
from Brizzly
in reply to nikolasco
-
Just got reply from Planned Parenthood re . Ever seen Enter The Dragon? Y'know the final scene where the army shows up too late? Yeah.
12:29 PM Nov 23rd
from identica
-
@ I appreciate that, but respecting recording requests is more important. The multiple-sticker confusion is really a problem.
12:12 PM Nov 23rd
from Brizzly
in reply to ASimon89
|
- Name maymaym
- Location San Francisco, CA
- Web http://maymay.net/
- Bio Technology geek extraordinaire, sexual freedom and community activist, prickly blogger and general free spirit.
|
