Profile_bird

Hey there! maggiekb1 is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving maggiekb1's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

maggiekb1

  1. @uptowngreen Cory's made one post on it. I'm planning another tomorrow. Just trying to get a good sense of the situation before I do.
  2. @pseudosu "pretty sure ppl who die w/o pos test aren't counted. Later some1 will calcul excess death #s"
  3. @pseudosu Branswell also says: Untested diagnosis will skew death tolls in short term. But...
  4. @CP_Branswell Cool. Thank you for the context.
  5. @pseudosu That's what CP_branswell says and she's the real expert here.
  6. @pseudosu We hv no clue how many ppl hv been infected. Can only estimate w/ modeling & eventually serology - but will never have firm #s
  7. @pseudosu For the record, I doubt an intentional conspiracy. Sounds more like stressed system that could be accidentally skewing own #s.
  8. @CP_Branswell How does that skew (or does it) the impact numbers? If docs are diagnosing on guesswork, do we really know # of infected?
  9. @pseudosu Just caught this: Antibiotics?????? Are you sure? It's a virus. Why the heck would hospital prescribe antibiotics?
  10. @cp_branswell Hearing anecdotally abt hospitals and docs diagnosing H1N1 w/o testing for it. Have you run into this anywhere?
  11. @pseudosu @VenetianBlond I wonder whether she'd know more about testing and diagnosis issues?
  12. @pseudosu @VenetianBlond One thought, @cp_branswell had a good piece on where death stats come from recently.
  13. @pseudosu @VenetianBlond Yeah, generally, I trust that CDC knows what they're doing. But if hospitals are skewing results?
  14. @VictorMilan I wonder about that as well. I'm troubled that many feminist sites are taking the new recs as an anti-woman thing.
  15. @VictorMilan so oversaturating its message that women think they're at higher risk than they are. It's a pretty nuanced problem.
  16. @VictorMilan (rather lefty in nature) that once was important to actually draw any attention to breast cancer. But that now may be...
  17. @VictorMilan Think you misunderstand me. I'm not talking a right v left thing here. I'm talking about a well-meaning non-profit industry...
  18. Question still remaining: Can you also grow the material to make that fuel in a sustainable way? #energy
  19. CEO of largest U.S. corn ethanol company says they can now produce cellulosic ethanol for $2.35/gal. Prob $2 by 2011. #energy
  20. That certainly brings back up some questions about the commercialization of breast cancer awareness & its effects.