Profile_bird

Hey there! kswedberg is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving kswedberg's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

kswedberg

  1. @vagrantradio no probs. :)
  2. RT @jquery: Binding Multiple Events to Reduce Redundancy with Event-Delegation Tooltips: http://is.gd/5oTZb
  3. @vagrantradio thx for the mention in your blog post re jQuery. btw, you misspelled my name. It's "Swedberg," not "Swedburg." ;)
  4. in bed before midnight. big win.
  5. fun times. paid $750 to have someone take a drill to my mouth. another sign I'm getting old: crown replacement
  6. @miketaylr thx for the suggestion. I think I'll wait until I have something else to add as well, but already changed it in my fork.
  7. RT @nbryan: Hah! Today's Javascript WTF o' the day: http://rmd.atdmt.com/tl/DocumentDotWrite.js
  8. @joshuaclayton thx for the support. wish I could have replied to comments on that commit, but github is eating my comments.
  9. @getify have you tried delete? window.foo = 'hello'; delete foo; // gone
  10. For the record, committed http://is.gd/5mls3 to align jQuery core with its own Style Guidelines: http://is.gd/5mlpa
  11. Frustrated that none of my attempts to comment on a GitHub commit have succeeded.
  12. @jamespadolsey thx for thecomment on that jQuery commit. Surprised that other guy thought curly braces were *less* readable.
  13. @paularmstrong hmmm. probably for code modularity? not so good to have core.js rely on ajax.js?
  14. yowza! jQuery.require is looking hot! http://is.gd/5jXVR
  15. @Nosredna Yeah, I like seasons, too. I just wish winter were a much shorter one around here.
  16. @reybango haha! I like that name, but def. agree w/ @getify. We'd be contrubuting to the crime of java/javascript conflation
  17. @danjamesceo thx for the link!
  18. @reybango Oh, Rey! Always so quick with the weather gloating, aren't you? ;-)
  19. Thx to @nbryan for the "blizzard" answer (35 mph winds + 500ft visibility). Congrats for being less lazy than I am (a dubious honor).
  20. I wonder how meteorologists define "blizzard." Maybe visibility is a factor? 3-5" hardly seems blizzardy, but it does look bad out there.