jorgeortiz85
-
RT @ RT @ WikiLeaks to release over half a million 9/11 intercepts
8:31 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
-
@ Likewise.
7:30 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to interfluidity
-
@ Bank = risk-free lending. I thought you wanted people to take more risks with their lending? More limited banks would help.
7:30 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to interfluidity
-
@ FDIC has (big!) flaws, but it's better than what we had before.
7:12 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to interfluidity
-
@ Our solution for 1929 bank runs (FDIC) is guaranteed bailouts of creditors, who we hope to make less reckless w/bank regultn.
7:11 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to interfluidity
-
@ His (vague) alternative policy isn't -credible-. We can't threaten to stick to it in the middle of a bank run, bc we won't.
7:05 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to interfluidity
-
@ The cost to society of NOT bailing out AIG/moneymarkets/etc would have been in the many trillions.
6:57 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to interfluidity
-
@ Our captured politicians/regulators have even less hope of making the threat credible.
6:51 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to interfluidity
-
@ Wasn't LEH an attempt to toughen? It's clear that, as a society, we can't credibly threaten to let TBTF institutions fail.
6:49 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to interfluidity
-
@ Every market is man-made, none are "natural". (You have an old post on what contracts our courts choose to honor/enforce.)
6:26 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to interfluidity
-
@ I'm cynical abt disc spvsn too, but hopeful abt changing incentives on politicians/regulators (eg, Lessig's Change Congress)
6:24 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to interfluidity
-
@ "" is my take on what he's saying. I say 1929 bc it sounds like he wants runs on [shadow] banks, eg, let LEH/AIG/FNM/FRE fail
6:22 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to interfluidity
-
@ Huh? "Flawed regulation doesn't work, so lets give up on regulation entirely." How is this not a return to 1929?
5:54 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to interfluidity
-
@ I think @ (who writes a Twitter client) sees these a lot. I believe he's implemented retry logic for his API calls.
3:42 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to kpich
-
@ Mine calls services remotely, but it doesn't run on remote services.
3:32 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
in reply to eishay
-
RT @: Add A Remote In-Process REPL to your Scala Project
2:26 PM Nov 24th
from Tweetie
-
@ After seeing how the sausage is made, I'm amazed they work at all.
8:36 PM Nov 23rd
from Tweetie
in reply to djspiewak
-
@ Mine starting shooting sparks once. Wasn't pretty.
4:12 PM Nov 23rd
from Tweetie
in reply to ekabanov
-
Number of WTFs/min reaching critical levels.
3:25 PM Nov 23rd
from Tweetie
-
@ It wouldn't fit in the tweet, but yes :)
1:15 PM Nov 23rd
from Tweetie
in reply to djspiewak
|
|
