Profile_bird

Hey there! jfelipe is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving jfelipe's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

jfelipe

  1. @Open_Sourcing 2 HICSS in a row were enough for some time, I have a project meeting and cannot attend this year :-(
  2. @edchi you can always drop me an email. I'm not sure if we'll have any chance to meet in person in a while :-)
  3. @olea Has puesto mal el nombre de Punset adrede, o ha sido una metedura de pata?
  4. @Open_Sourcing Adoption models are mainly driven by specific demands. Contributions are growing, including big and mid-size stakeholders
  5. @Open_Sourcing Section 6 of http://tiny.cc/sBU1v is actually the baseline for our updated sessions on taxonomy for business models with OSS
  6. @evgenymorozov With this misuse of Wikipedia and the other pointless article on "elusive" business models in OSS NYT messed it all up
  7. Interview on El Periodico de Catalunya http://tiny.cc/uT3BD Clearly reflects: I don't think WKP is in danger in the short term. Nice graphs.
  8. @Emmabarnett drop me an email and we can talk
  9. @dirkriehle @cdaffara At least, NYT should read http://tiny.cc/sBU1v then talk about business models in OSS
  10. @WardCunningham Didn't knew this http://nokogiri.org/ parser. I'll give it a try, as soon as I have some time, for my own tool :-)
  11. @edchi Congrats for your promotion, Ed. You and your team are doing superb work.
  12. @0pensource Tell Pittsburgh Post-Gazette about http://tiny.cc/sBU1v and they'll get better picture of business models for OSS ;-)
  13. RT @evgenymorozov: The Sunday Times asked me to pen an op-ed on Wikipedia - and I did (subheadline/headline aren't mine) http://bit.ly/5 ...
  14. What the heck? RT: @dirkriehle: Amused to notice that #openspace article on Wikipedia is flagged as spam; if I only had more time...
  15. Again: stability of monthly number of active editors is compatible with growing net loss in number of community of editors in Wikipedia
  16. To some journalists: please verify your claims about inaccuracy of our results before making inexact claims: http://tiny.cc/Du6uR
  17. RT @libresoft: http://tinyurl.com/yzmang2 Our research on Wikipedia in El Pais
  18. @sanacl Thanks!!
  19. @Emmabarnett In fact, these are different and (complementary) numbers. Please read a thorough explanation: http://tiny.cc/Du6uR
  20. Interviews with Wikipedia experts on the Strategy Plan for its sustainability http://tiny.cc/y3B2F includes mine: http://tiny.cc/oEjLC (PDF)