jayrosen_nyu
-
@ @ @ I dream of a quiz-based system that adjusts to me based on my proven level of background knowledge.
12 minutes ago
via web
in reply to kleinmatic
-
@ @ But the fact is they didn't. And that is where you have a newsroom culture and training problem.
44 minutes ago
via web
-
@ @ Bet if we asked them Campos and McCrank would say they wrote it for everyone interested in the story.
about 1 hour ago
via web
-
@ @ @ Or, if you're not trying to make it accessible to everyone, just close followers, find a way to say so.
about 1 hour ago
via web
in reply to pbump
-
@ @ @ I like that approach, too.
about 1 hour ago
via web
in reply to tcarmody
-
@ @ Okay, but the background graf is a fail too. Too little for the newcomer, too much for the close follower.
about 1 hour ago
via web
in reply to alexismadrigal
-
Reinventing the article. A Storify by @ based on yesterday's exchanges on Twitter about missing background.
about 1 hour ago
via web
-
@ Agreed. Also, the fact that there is a way for users to solve the problem does not mean you solved the user's problem.
about 8 hours ago
via web
in reply to davewiner
-
@ I'm glad you wrote that. It is very common for people to wave away the whole problem by saying: that's what Wikipedia is for!
about 8 hours ago
via web
in reply to davewiner
-
Scripting News: Wikipedia as an explainer.
about 9 hours ago
via Blork
-
@ @ No, his point is you stay awake but shut up.
about 23 hours ago
via web
in reply to DannyHorowitz
-
New post on articles de/reconstructed as assets & paths: @ @ @ @
about 23 hours ago
via Echofon
in reply to AntDeRosa
-
@ Thanks for the 100% condescending advice, but I will stick with the way I am doing it. Lots don't like it, but enough do :-)
about 24 hours ago
via web
in reply to The_Analyst
-
@ On those rare occasions, I comment on Wall Street as a befuddled taxpayer. I take it you think we should shut up, then?
about 24 hours ago
via web
in reply to The_Analyst
-
@ @ @ @ @ That's what everyone says who thinks this problem is not really a problem. :-)
about 24 hours ago
via web
in reply to GusSent
-
@ Oh, I'm interested. Very. I do the best I can. But there's a lot of tacit and technical knowledge I lack. Often, I'm clueless.
about 24 hours ago
via web
in reply to The_Analyst
-
@ @ @ @ Dave: I wrote it in 2008. We just haven't made that much progress on it.
about 24 hours ago
via web
in reply to davewiner
-
@ @ @ Right. The story doesn't come with any way to access the background knowledge it actually depends on.
4:45 PM May 26th
via web
in reply to jeffjarvis
-
@ @ I don't have a problem with Reuters writing for the investor class. I just want them to tell me: "not for you, Jay."
4:42 PM May 26th
via web
in reply to felixsalmon
-
@ What these people on this critical phone call do, what they couldn't do because of screw-ups, and how that affected other people.
4:35 PM May 26th
via web
in reply to AntDeRosa
|
- Name Jay Rosen
- Location New York City
- Web http://www.presst...
- Bio I teach journalism at NYU, direct the Studio 20 program there, critique the press and study new media. I don't do lifecasting but mindcasting on Twitter.
|