Profile_bird

Hey there! jayrosen_nyu is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving jayrosen_nyu's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

jayrosen_nyu

  1. That's right, @bramabramson. We could also say the Supreme Court of Canada held there are no journalists: only journalism.
  2. Sorry, Slate's Big Money; you've gotta do way better than some brand X debunk on hyperlocal news http://jr.ly/qmh9 Read the comments.
  3. My PressThink post, "Audience Atomization Overcome," rendered in Italian http://jr.ly/qmfm This one has really gotten around... :-)
  4. Supreme Court of Canada broadens libel protection and says there are no journalists, only citizens http://jr.ly/qmeu (via @david_a_eaves)
  5. The print guys won; they're in charge of the web now. @jimbradysp is salivating. The Ombudsman is taking time off http://jr.ly/qmeg
  6. Corrected link! Twittertime.es created a curated feed from my "best mindcasters I know" list, which has 1,000+ subscribers http://jr.ly/qkdm
  7. I reply to many, I know it's all in good fun but I don't make "media predictions." I'm still trying to understand RSS.
  8. The real world of pro-am journalism, far from the abstractions in which I trade http://jr.ly/qjvf But connected to them.
  9. Well, this is helpful. @sjcobrien put parts 1-5 of my interview with Clay Shirky in one place, in order http://jr.ly/ymh7
  10. Can't spill the beans yet but there's a media company with journalists and assets into developing the http://explainthis.org method with me.
  11. The print guys won. Until the people running the Washington Post grasp that, reports taking no account of the web will continue to appear.
  12. Who you gonna believe? The police department or your own staffer's lying eyes? http://jr.ly/qifi The Post has problems.
  13. My Q & A with Clay Shirky: now on YouTube. This part: the participatory public and political journalism http://jr.ly/qib8 (8 mins)
  14. The claim that lots and lots of people said Twitter could topple the Iranian regime is a piece of shit. But it will go on and on. Linkessly.
  15. Also, @stevebuttry: paywalls prevent the reach required to get the results that make investigative journalism worth supporting via paywalls!
  16. @AnnaTarkov It means a smarter writer would have distinguished between the two claims, linked to examples of both, and then tried to debunk.
  17. @mathewi It's Salon, not Slate. That item is a piece of crap because it mixes up Twitter getting the word out from Iran vs. toppling regime.
  18. If you missed it in my feed last night today's must ponder post is @johnmcquaid on Matt Taibbi and more http://jr.ly/qfgg
  19. The notion @johnmcquaid is floating: just as there are companies too big to fail... there are stories "too big to report." http://jr.ly/qfgg
  20. I'll have more to say on this. For now: @johnmcquaid is asking the biggest questions there are about watchdog journalism http://jr.ly/qfgg