jamesmarcusbach
-
@ She's asking what to call it other than "data." Perhaps "discoveries" is a good word, too.
about 3 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to QualityFrog
-
@ Sounds like we are alike in that way. My 20's I hated myself. My's 30's I learned to accept how I learn. My 40's I don't fret.
about 4 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to ShimmerGeek
-
@ You can say "what we learn from a test."
about 4 hours ago
from web
in reply to lanettecream
-
@ I bet there's more than several times you can cite when you were very energized and concentrated in your learning.
about 4 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to ShimmerGeek
-
@ Then I glad I didn't tone it down, especially the first chapter, which offended some of my early reviewers. Dad loved it tho'.
about 10 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to ShimmerGeek
-
@ (that's one reason why I'm a good teacher... I have been through a lot of bad ideas...)
about 18 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to lanettecream
-
@ Your bad ideas today make you a better teacher, tomorrow!
about 18 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to lanettecream
-
@ Also, confidence can from from realizing that a bad idea, once identified, becomes a tool for teaching others.
about 18 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to lanettecream
-
@ @ I'm about to transpect with Michael about the same question I ask you. (transpection is a kind of dialog)
about 19 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to michaelbolton
-
@ One source of confidence is to practice working through ideas with your colleagues.
about 19 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to lanettecream
-
@ From your blog, I can tell you are talented. I'm eager to help your talent blossom. One requirement for that is confidence.
about 19 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to lanettecream
-
@ Thank you!
about 20 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to ShimmerGeek
-
@ I feel better hearing that. Questioning you is, from me, a sign of respect. But I don't mean to push too hard.
about 20 hours ago
from TweetDeck
in reply to lanettecream
-
@ I want to help real testers, too, and when I seek clarity in myself and other testers, it's because that helps us avoid waste.
about 21 hours ago
from TwitterBerry
-
@ Your post seems a bit defensive. I wasn't attacking you, I was trying to find out what you meant by what you said.
about 21 hours ago
from TwitterBerry
-
@ Okay, fair enough. It would be fun to do an IM session on this, sometime. Skype me. (ID: satisfice)
11:54 AM Nov 14th
from TweetDeck
in reply to lanettecream
-
@ I can tell you my opinions of all this. But I'd really love to see you blog about it, first. I'm following your blog now.
11:52 AM Nov 14th
from TweetDeck
in reply to lanettecream
-
@ They throw around a lot of words without really thinking about them, it seems to me.
11:51 AM Nov 14th
from TweetDeck
in reply to lanettecream
-
@ That planning stuff is just propaganda. Ask yourself "what does planning MEAN?"
11:51 AM Nov 14th
from TweetDeck
in reply to lanettecream
-
@ IEEE is not a person we can cross-examine. It doesn't think anything. But for the record, it's totally wrong about planning!
11:50 AM Nov 14th
from TweetDeck
in reply to lanettecream
|
- Name James Marcus Bach
- Location Eastsound, WA
- Web http://www.buccan...
- Bio Author of Secrets of a Buccaneer-Scholar, high school dropout, unschooling parent, philosopher, neo-pyrrhonian skeptic, software tester
|
