Profile_bird

Hey there! jamesatracy is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What are you doing? Join today to start receiving jamesatracy's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

jamesatracy

  1. You can now get all Atheist Buzz updates by following @atheistbuzz
  2. New: Atheist Products Buzz page - http://www.anatheist.net/bu... #atheist #atheism
  3. @Adam4004 I am not even optimistic that the Ninth will repeat his prior success.
  4. @Adam4004 Oh, right. Michael Newdow already has a challenge pending in the Ninth (filed in 2007) according to his w (cont) http://tl.gd/s3r0
  5. Catholics and Where Their Money Goes | Please Sir, May I Have Some More?: http://bit.ly/3I355M
  6. @Adam4004 On what ruling from the 9th?
  7. @Adam4004 Well, so far it has not resulted in that interpretation, right? :)
  8. @Adam4004 Well, for one thing the procedure of Judicial Review has been put into place for quite some time. Judges (cont) http://tl.gd/s3jn
  9. @Adam4004 I posted our conversation on my blog and added some additional thoughts after your last reply.
  10. New blog post: Conversation on Church & State http://bit.ly/3kiN6I
  11. @Adam4004 Yes, I am well aware of that. But the meaning of "establishing religion" today and for us is not the exac (cont) http://tl.gd/s2g6
  12. @Adam4004 I will leave you with this and then I have to go eat. I suppose my general point here is that something c (cont) http://tl.gd/s2bc
  13. @Adam4004 Not at all. See, to go back to your original question, what I do not agree with is an interpretive inflex (cont) http://tl.gd/s29r
  14. @Adam4004 It is not a different meaning. It is an expansion of that meaning. "Establishment of religion" can be read narrowly or broadly.
  15. @Adam4004 Well, no, of course not. The complete opposite extreme does not follow from my comments.
  16. Find someone new to follow this Friday - http://bit.ly/Kgf7T
  17. @Adam4004 What is certain, however, is that I am completely and utterly unimpressed by some of the specious argumen (cont) http://tl.gd/s24h
  18. @Adam4004 I am not a lawyer but to the extent that one can unambiguously determine original intent I do not believe (cont) http://tl.gd/s23s
  19. @Adam4004 That's a fair response!
  20. @Adam4004 Okay, right. It was a blog post.