Jambutter
- @ Scientific American article needs to be part of core argument describing changes needed in US food system.about 4 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to Earthnik
- @ Article is from the editors of Scientific American...not just "an opinion", but keep throwing your . We're used to it.about 4 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to derekbalsley
- @ I have 120 Nobel laureates. What's in your hand, other than "product defense" tactics of fear, uncertainty and doubt? about 4 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to derekbalsley
- @ Not liking convincing evidence re: independent research on ? Comes from pub that 120 Nobel laureates have written for...about 4 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to derekbalsley
- @ Its called patent protection and serious, well-funded threats of litigation. In such cases, control is easy.about 4 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to natejtaylor
- @ Weak. If is "in" a product, then tell me how is it not an ingredient?about 4 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to Shoo_B
- @ Hope your following my tweets on independent research. Great stuff @ has no interest in acknowledging.about 4 hours ago from Power Twitter
- @ "...things aren't quite working out"? We should catch up soon, as I'm curious what that is referring to...about 4 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to leezukor
- @ Hope my last couple tweets effectively respond to your question re: independent research of about 4 hours ago from Power Twitter
- "no truly independent research can be legally conducted on many critical questions regarding the (#GMO) technology" about 4 hours ago from Power Twitter
- @ According to Scientific American, only studies that seed cos. have approved ever see light of peer-reviewed journal --Not rightabout 4 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to natejtaylor
- @ For decade Monsanto, Pioneer and Syngenta user agreements explicitly forbid use of seeds for any independent researchabout 4 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to natejtaylor
- @ See your point and agree that its too bad about Vioxx side effects.about 4 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to docsconz
- @ Given agritech companies "veto power over the work of independent researchers", I doubt we see many independent studies.about 4 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to natejtaylor
- @ Independent research AND govt use of its findings v. product defense/industry-funded PR "research" is needed throughout food bizabout 4 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to nycUlla
- @ Unfortunately, a disturbing number of Vioxx users aren't here to share their stories. Loses that could have been avoided!about 4 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to docsconz
- @ Sure...as soon as independent research (none funded by industry) is what is used by USDA, FDA, etc.about 5 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to natejtaylor
- FDA scientists estimate that Vioxx caused a total of 88-139,000 heart attacks. Makes it tough to trust industry-funded research.about 5 hours ago from Power Twitter
- Vioxx: great example of product defense consults keeping product on market (3 years) despite clear evidence re: heart attack risk.about 5 hours ago from Power Twitter
- @ UW is a great school! Unfortunately I don't know a soul there anymore. Best of luck!about 5 hours ago from Power Twitter in reply to OliverRanch
|
- Name Rob Smart
- Location Calais, Vermont
- Web http://everytable...
- Bio Creating sustainable #ProFood solutions offering great food experiences, while improving health, environment, and local economies
|
