Profile_bird

Hey there! harrym is using Twitter.

Twitter is a free service that lets you keep in touch with people through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What's happening? Join today to start receiving harrym's tweets.

Already using Twitter
from your phone? Click here.

harrym

  1. @factuk ISPs do not act at your behest. Protecting jobs is fine but throwing away centuries-old legal protections to do it? Stupid. about 10 hours ago from TweetDeck in reply to factuk
  2. @factuk we shd rlly ask: why do you think it's ok 2 impose extra-judicial sanctions on net users just 'cause you don't want public licenses? about 10 hours ago from TweetDeck in reply to factuk
  3. @factuk ??? No one would use cc/carbon-copy in a name. Context is different. But I have to say: it's not terribly important :) about 10 hours ago from TweetDeck in reply to factuk
  4. @lfeatherstone Just read your postcode data blog post. I'm one of the ernestmarples.com people -- interested in meeting for a chat? about 11 hours ago from TweetDeck
  5. @factuk Well. Not for everyone else, y'know? I'm sure that sums up something pertinent... about 11 hours ago from TweetDeck in reply to factuk
  6. The only person @widdecombepp is following is @MegReees. What a special honour :) about 11 hours ago from TweetDeck
  7. @factuk @Create_CC "Create_CC" isn't a very sensible name. CC == Creative Commons! about 11 hours ago from TweetDeck in reply to factuk
  8. Regarding PAYE: why is it acceptable for the government to expect employers to collect its taxes for free? Argh! about 15 hours ago from TweetDeck
  9. Hearing scary things about massive industry lobbying on #threestrikes. If you're not a member of the Open Rights Group, join quick! (pls RT) 12:02 PM Nov 28th from TweetDeck
  10. Heading home from office. Working on exciting things! 2:22 PM Nov 23rd from TweetDeck
  11. @dracos Thought so -- this makes me doubt that affirmative resolutions really provide oversight. Call me a cynic, but... :) 4:17 AM Nov 20th from TweetDeck in reply to dracos
  12. Wondering how many SIs have been voted down as a proportion of total number passed (kinda @dracos!) 3:50 AM Nov 20th from TweetDeck
  13. @dracos That's slightly less bad, but I still think it's not sufficient protection - bad stuff will sneak through. Needs to be amendable 3:50 AM Nov 20th from TweetDeck in reply to dracos
  14. RT @digigov: Guidance on putting consultation descriptions into linked data using RDFa available on the COI website http://bit.ly/1TBJBk 3:21 AM Nov 20th from TweetDeck
  15. @dracos There's big difference. No amending. More likely to accept bad things if the balance is good, debate allows badness to be lessened 3:20 AM Nov 20th from TweetDeck in reply to dracos
  16. @dracos by *resolution*. Not debate. Rubber-stamping. Almost useless. 3:10 AM Nov 20th from TweetDeck in reply to dracos
  17. RT @jimkillock: Record industry publishes #digitaleconomy bill before government http://bit.ly/digitaleconom... #threestrikes 3:09 AM Nov 20th from TweetDeck
  18. Oh, it's "apparent"? Well that's ok then. 3:07 AM Nov 20th from TweetDeck
  19. apparent infringement: wrt a copyright infringement report, means the infringement the report states appears to have taken place. *headdesk* 3:07 AM Nov 20th from TweetDeck
  20. Digital Economy Bill draft: http://bit.ly/4d1eln 2:58 AM Nov 20th from TweetDeck