errolmorris
-
the immiseration of reading + the immiseration of writing + the immiseration of not-writing + the immiseration of being immiserated...
8:46 PM May 27th
via web
-
Punctum, studium... I must be missing the point. Some things effect us personally; some things politically; some things socially? So what?
4:39 PM May 26th
via Mobile Web
-
When I figure out what I'm doing, I'm going to tell everyone. (OK?)
7:51 AM May 24th
via web
-
My new book, "A Wilderness of Error," will be published in August...
7:59 PM May 23rd
via web
-
I take it back. Please read WIAN, Part Three. (And read my book.)
7:58 PM May 23rd
via web
-
Brevity is the soul of concision. (I wish I could say more about this.)
7:01 PM May 23rd
via web
-
There. Now, you don't have to bother reading WIAN, Part Three.
7:00 PM May 23rd
via web
-
Punctum, studium et al... You can classify your beliefs about photographs, but that in good measure misses the point.
6:57 PM May 23rd
via web
-
LOOK AT THE FENTON PHOTOGRAPHS. LOOK AT ANY PHOTOGRAPH... To determine what we are looking at, an investigation is needed.
6:50 PM May 23rd
via web
-
A kosher kitchen. Two sinks––one for reference, the other for beliefs. Most writers about photography discuss the latter, ignore the former.
6:46 PM May 23rd
via web
-
We can believe many things about what a photograph depicts, even though most of them may be false.
6:42 PM May 23rd
via web
-
A photograph has two parts: the beliefs associated with it and what it refers to.
6:40 PM May 23rd
via web
-
A proper name captures the human predicament — the need for significance and the need to be grounded in the world.
6:39 PM May 23rd
via web
-
It is not enough to be told that photographs are causally connected to what they are photos of. We need to know what we are looking at.
6:34 PM May 23rd
via web
-
A photograph is a kind of shadow. Shadows lack substance, but there is a causal relationship between a person and their shadow.
6:30 PM May 23rd
via web
-
A name under a photograph could suggest that a person looks like this—but it usually asserts: this is a photograph of that person.
6:23 PM May 23rd
via web
-
No one (to my knowledge) has examined the similarity between Kripke's account of proper names and photography.
6:20 PM May 23rd
via web
-
Ask yourself: do our beliefs about a photograph determine what a photograph is a photograph of?
6:19 PM May 23rd
via web
-
I HAVE DECIDED TO DO SOMETHING HOPELESSLY PEDANTIC. (Repeat phrases from "WIAN, Part Three." I have no other choice.)
6:18 PM May 23rd
via web
-
Don't get me wrong. Walsh's review is very, very kind and perceptive.
7:20 PM May 22nd
via web
|
|